Why Roddur Roy is important and why we are to be blamed for undermining his gravity?

It's totally upto the social framework how you take a person,and the sense of being civilized is completely upto your philosophy.Whether Roddur Roy will be remembered or not is completely time relevant question and we can only have some rough guesses about that.With a high risk,I can presumably say that Roddur Roy will be remembered among a little group of people,too little.In a recent interview,Roddur Roy told he is influenced by political structures of Nabarun.And we are accepting Nabarun because he is not into profanity.The message is the same-isn't it?Some people tagging him as psycho while his "And Stella turnsinto mom" is a psychoanalytic writing,paradox ,huh?

One of the most important complains I have seen against this man is why he is not persuasive about his philosophy and stances?
Look at the object of his political stance.And also look for how many years he is been preaching his ideas-does that really say that Roddur Roy is a business gimmick?At least to me,he is not.He is not a sudden uprise.
What's Roddur Roy's messages?
Do you just want to rescind this person for using slangs?For not following genarel sense ecstasy ?
We have constrained Rabindranath to a certain bubble from where you are not supposed to question about him.If you really believe in the concept cultural freedom,please don't set any line to practise culture.Allegation against him is distorting singing of Rabindranath by including cuss words.

Not only from a lense of highbrow or being a pothead netizen,Roddur's political thoughts have to be considered more importantly than a simple 'Jete Jete Ekla Pothe'.
To a man whose answer to define Obscene is "এক শ্রেণির মানুষ সম্পদহীনতার কারণে ভাল করে বাঁচতে পারছেন না, আরেক দল মানুষ বিলাসব্যসনে বাঁচছেন, সমাজের পক্ষে এটাই চূড়ান্ত অশ্লীলতা। এনআরসি করে লোকজনকে দেশ থেকে তাড়িয়ে দেওয়া হবে বলা হচ্ছে, তাতে একদল লোক খুশি। কেউ কেউ আবার বলছে, হ্যাঁ ওদের তাড়িয়ে দিলে আমরা ভাল থাকব। আমার এটাকে মনে হয় সব থেকে বেশি অশ্লীল।”-You need to keep aside your cultural elitism and give a look at this man.What's wrong in moxism,the practice of liberty,love amd peace establishment to reach social and individual salvation through literature, performing art and spirituality?Degrading (In netizen's description) Rabindranath ?
As a post modernist improvisation on socio-economic cultural,Roddur is relevant with present.Rabindranath is not important there.

Have we any problem with Jimmy Porter from Osborne's 'Angry young man' where we find Jimmy continuously making complains against the corruption , injustice of the society, class and sex conflicts as well as against the Church.Sometime Jimmy is vulgar to express his frustration for being educated and born in middle class family.Roddur is also shouting to wake people from the cultural sleep though he is seemed very uncultured.Roddur Roy seems to me a totally frustrated brat for this fucked up society.And Somewhere his frustration and Jimmy's frustration are same.Because both of them are showing us the naked picture of our infested society.In present time, Roddur is only the person who can tell ," king,where is your cloths ? " very easily.

And if you still can't accept this man just for obscene respresntation of Rabindranath,your sense of culture is for anything but humanism.